Saturday, September 12, 2009

Perception


During the last lesson, we talked about perception, the process by which we make sense of the world around us. And the instructor showed us a picture of a dyad with the esplanade as the backdrop. She asked for what we saw.

Almost immediately, seemingly without thinking, some said they were a couple, some, friends. Others said they were siblings or cousins, whereby one of them in particular was pointed out as a male and older than the famale. After a little more than five minutes, the instructor said, "you only see what you want to see."

The discussion carried on, the examination of the photo this time more carefully after the remark. I still could not figure out what other relationships there could be between two people of opposing genders. A little later, Ms Hui finally announced that the male we'd been discussing about all along, was actually a female, and younger than the other.

Naturally, there were oohs and ahhs. I was dumbfounded. I'd identified the person as a male at first glance. She had short hair, and in many ways, resembled a male. It never occurred to me to look deeper and beyond.

In retrospect, that we only see what we want to see certainly holds. And more often that not, we fail to see beyond the surface.

They say seeing is believing, but sometimes, looks may be deceiving.

One classic example would be Susan Boyle, a participant of Britain's Got Talent. The moment the frumpy woman stepped on stage, she was written off by almost everybody. When she said that she was 47, judge Simon Cowell raised his eyebrows. Yet she was undaunted and stated matter-of-factly while doing a little twirl that "that's just one side of me". Later, to Simon's question of her dream, she replied that she wants to be a professional singer like Elaine Paige. It was at this point that the crowd actually rolled their eyes and laughed at her. Even judge Amanda acknowledged that everybody was against her, and that they "were all being very cynical".

However the instant the same woman started the song, she wow-ed the crowd so much so that within barely 30 seconds, there was a standing ovation. It was indeed, a serenade in melting tones. And the initially sceptical Simon appeared to be astonished by the performance he called extraordinary.

Then we come to this realisation that such is the perception of most people - that a person so frumpy and almost old would not be able to sing, not to say sing as well as Elaine Paige, that an unfashionable person may not have any talents.


Whatever happened to "never judge a book by its cover"?

Today, I watched with the heart palpitating as a drama of some sort unfolded before my very eyes. As the students were dismissed from tuition, their excited chatters turned the initially quiet centre into a marketplace. Then it was quietness again once they hurried off home. And then I would go back to the one or two students I would keep behind for not being able to complete their homework. Such is the routine every Saturday evening.

Yet this fateful day, something else happened. Something that neither the receptionist nor I had ever encountered.

Instead of quietness, there was noise. A man in particular was raising his voice at another lady, both of whom had crying boys beside them. Apparently, their children almost got into a fight and their teacher could not manage them. Without even clarifying matters, the Sinaporean father demanded a reason for the Chinese boy's hitting his son. Later, things got out of control when, in a bid to protect her son, the Chinese mother retaliated verbally. This verbal exchange quickly escalated into a heated argument.

The unreasonable dad actually had the cheek to tell the Chinese mother to go back to China, and not "come and steal our ricebowls" in Mandarin. Now, who wouldn't be angered by such nasty remarks? 'Twas when the father finally calmed down to have the sense to verify matters when he found out that the boy, in actual fact, never laid a finger on his son at all.

It turned out that the teacher did not even validate the accusation that the boy was cheating, when he claimed that he was only using the electronic dictionary as a translator.

Then it all began to dawn on me how biased against certain groups of people some of us can be. In all honesty, after hearing stories of scandalous affairs and all, my view of the Chinese women has slanted. And I have to admit that I, too, have stereotyped them, viewing them through my own pair of tinted glasses.

But to come to think of it now, how would I feel if others were to view myself this way?

Because somewhere deep down, I know that no matter how many black sheep there are, there will still be a handful of good ones. And I definitely would not want others to view me any differently just because of those ne'er-do-wells. Perhaps this episode acts as a reminder, at least for me, to constantly put myself into another's shoes, so as not to say or do things which may hurt the person's feelings.

Because, words can kill.

29 comments:

  1. I agree with insights.

    Quoted,
    Whatever happened to "never judge a book by its cover"?

    Sadly, in the norms of society, it is often too easy to say the correct words but often hard to practice what we preach. The ability to stereotype is present in everybody and we often view people through tinted glasses.

    It is also because, believing what you see is always the easiest, rather than having to interpret. Don't you think so ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey,
    Just read your page on perception. I did a dicussion on perception for my page too. I guess most of the people that you have mentioned do make perceptual errors such as oversimplification of others. But, there are still some people ut there who really do based on factual evidences to conculde the situation. :)

    Comment on my blog too at http://handwritingsonthewall.wordpress.com/

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think you have learnt a wonderful and valuable lesson through your experiences.

    Just some random thoughts running through my mind when I was reading your entry.

    How many times we were reminded "never judge a book by its cover"?
    And yet how many times people are doing just that?

    No one likes to be hurt.
    And yet we see many instances of people hurting each other, physically or verbally. Heh..

    With our senses (through our eyes, ears, noses, etc.. ), we will continue to perceive the world the way we want to see, whether we like it or not. We just have to sharpen our senses then, through our years of experiences, what some people call it as wisdom. Haha..

    Perhaps, it's really good to pause before acting, reacting in sticky/tricky situations...
    For that slight delay in action can give a little bit more space to sort out thoughts.

    Having said that, I don't think we can immediately expect ourselves to be "error-free" from now on.
    I think in the course of learning, we may continue to make mistakes.
    Especially when we are genuinely learning new things, we will continue to track on new and unfamiliar grounds, and therefore even more prone to mistakes. Nevertheless, the beauty lies in our effort to also learn from these mistakes and evolved being a better person.
    不懂要问
    不会来学
    作错来改
    不怕有错,只怕不改过。:o)

    Enjoy your exploring and learning journeys.
    All the best! :o)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Perceptions are usually wrong at first sight. Through communication, these biased views can disappear. Regarding the point on ladies from China, I too have similar experiences. Yet when I found out that the foot reflexologist that I patronized often is actually just a 19yr old girl with innocent views about the whole world, after constant communication with her, I realised not all China ladies get into scandalous affairs. In fact, this very reflexologist is very much like us, playing online games and surfing web and Facebook whenever she's free.

    Judging a book by its cover is not a crime. Our cognitive behaviour is always faster than our logical behaviour. What matters most is whether we have the 'heart' to uncover the truth.

    =D

    ReplyDelete
  5. woo~
    certainly feels great to see some comments. much appreciated! ^^


    fangel:
    At the age of 19, I can't say that I've experienced a lot, nor can I say that my experiences are pathetically little. And through them, I have always seen "never judge a book by its cover" as simply, pardon me, nonsense. Because humans being humans, we tend to almost always judge.
    Because there are just too many real-life episodes to prove so. I was working at this private training centre whereby participants are able to collect their certificates as long as they sit for the tests. There was once this old mother came to collect it on behalf of her daughter. Said her daughter felt that the certificate did not matter to her for she would not be employed. And after signing the acknowledgement form for the collection of the certificate, this mother sat me down and spoke of her daughter to me.
    Apparently, her daughter haven't worked before, and she's already nearing her thirties. (Yes, you can expect how old the mother is. AND SHE IS STILL WORKING NOW TO SUPPORT THE DAUGHTER.) It wasn't that she never went for interviews. It was that she had gone for only one too many that she got demoralised. Because the employers did not think much of her. Which obviously led to the result of her not being employed.
    And why is that so? All because of her learning disabilities. But she'd tried to work hard.
    And they wrote her off just because of that, not looking beyond at her diligence. She went into depression as a result.
    Is it not grown-ups who preach about "never judge a book by its cover"?
    Granted, it might be human instincts to do so. But did they have to make it so obvious?

    And I can't agree more on the part on believing what you see. I, for one, jump to conclusions solely based on the surface. Perhaps like what you say, it simply makes things a whole lot easier. But then things happen and then you ask yourself why you didn't clarfiy matters in the first place. And you laugh at yourself for being oh-so-shallow.

    handwritingsonthewall:
    I guess it was the exercise that we did in lecture which really made me think.
    Perhaps so. =))

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hello Min Zhi!

    It's really a wonder how we form perception of things. In so many cases I really think there's this part of the mind that prevents us from seeing things from a correct perspective.
    Maybe we'll learn it in psychology sooon.

    And I like the photo that you posted:)
    Indeed what matters most is how we see ourselves.

    Do help me comment on my blog post too!
    http://commmediadiscourse.wordpress.com

    =)Kai Ting

    ReplyDelete
  7. SPN:
    MR SIM! I am so flattered by your support! ;p
    Yes, afterall, life's a learning journey right teacher? HAHA.
    thanks thanks,
    ALL THE BEST TO YOU TOO!

    clouds:
    True true. Ultimately we manage our perception based on communication aye. lols.

    ReplyDelete
  8. hey!i agree.we really should learn to look beyond the cover and look deep down inside for the truth instead of always assuming and having wrong perceptions. Very often because we always judge the book by its cover,out perception is flawed.

    ReplyDelete
  9. is racism one of the seven deadly sins? if it isn't it should be.
    okay. i think it isnt.
    people can be judge others from time to time. but is there a need to start insulting one person and her country?
    technically speaking, (i know i told you this before, but) that guy is from China too you know. at least his forefathers came from China.
    people tend to judge a book by its cover, its common. everyone does it. but unless you really know that person, i believe one does not have the right to insult others.
    actually, even if you know that person, you still can't insult him or her.
    sheesh.
    in conclusion. RACISM SHOULD BE A SIN. -.-

    ReplyDelete
  10. dumb dumb dumb.
    i just realise. this aint racism.
    ehhs. countrism?

    ReplyDelete
  11. LOLOLOL. wasn't that what i told you. boo.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Perception usually do carry any negative connotations with it.
    since its just a mere personal perspective.

    Its usually stereotyping that carries a negative air with it.
    for instance, is this case, its the stereotyping of Chinese nationals as people who are rude and bad mannered, that caused such a bad misunderstanding.

    Though i have to admit that i am guilty to such stereotyping.

    ReplyDelete
  13. wahh... damn bad. i mean, how can the man wrongly accused that poor chinese lady? tts so not gentleman at all. it just shows how childish that man is. singaporean guys... hhaa

    ReplyDelete
  14. i know larhs. i just remembered what.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hi minzhi!
    very insightful entry!
    As much as most of us would hate to admit it, I think we are all guilty of stereotyping. I think alot of the time most of us are not even aware of the fact that we ARE guilty of stereotyping!

    ReplyDelete
  16. commmediadiscourse:
    yes indeed, hope we do learn that! sure thing. =)

    Paveena:
    yes, which is why "never judge a book by its cover" doesn't really hold aye.

    whatisadriansblog:
    lols did you mean perceptions do NOT bring with them negative connotations? hahs. yes me too. =(

    Vanny:
    YEAH LORS. tsktsk. that father was such a bad example to his son please.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I was just thinking about why people form such stereotyping perceptions in the first place. Is it to prepare themselves in what they think might be harmful, or just that they are in denial.

    Meaning to say, they build this barrier to protect themselves through such bias perception for their own personal interests. Like how the homosexuals were being wrongly perceived. Was it plain harmless wrong perception or do they not want to admit the existance of homosexuals that is not exactly acceptable in a conservative society in Singapore. Same goes to your example of the China man. Why was the local so quick to point finger without stopping to clarify? Was it just because of the things he heard? Or was it out of being protective of his own child?

    Perhaps stereotyping can be a result of 'impulsivity' where people just based things that are floating in their head. Rather than going deeper to search for an understanding
    (which takes more time), they just pick up the superficial details. Just like what fangel said, believing what you see is easier than having to interpret and deduce, remembering that deductions and interpretations take time too.

    So stereotyping is the quickest way to view somebody with the limited time that they encounter situations and people although it might be a wrong understanding.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hi there!! I am sure that when we meet someone, the very first thing that we will take notice of will be the person physical appearances. That is human nature, we cant change that. Only when we bother to take time to know the person then we will be able to see the inner self of one person. Therefore, we cant blame people for having such perception if subsequently they bother to make the effort to look more in-depth in one's inner-self.
    For stereotyping, i can only say that the media have influences our perspective greatly as reports on china prostitutes or china mistresses keet surfacing on the news. Therefore, i can only say that it is all down to personal decision on how they want to view things as.

    ReplyDelete
  19. What an indepth passage!
    Good Thinking!

    ReplyDelete
  20. great post!awesome english!

    anyway...i totally agree that never judge a book by its cover, what matters are the contents!...and its really the right thing to do to put ourself in another's shoes...words definitely can kill!

    to victims! you can have failures!but do not let yourself be defeated!be brave and become stronger!At least leave no regrets!

    ReplyDelete
  21. hey minzhi, great essay you've got there, it's really deep (:
    i guess everyone's guilty of judging others from the outside sometime or another, it's innate in us but i believe what we improve things by just ridding ourselves of thoughts of superficiality.
    and speaking of how looks may be deceving, it's totally like how our dear chem teacher clubs though he's a married man with a child!! hahahaha.

    ReplyDelete
  22. SHRUTHI says:
    yoo minziii!! very insightful :). u had said 'whatever happened to 'never judge a book by its cover''sadly, i think as often as this is said it never really has been put into practise, very few people hoestly try to follow this and i'll be damned if evryone who has commented on this post were never guilty of this. including the writer and myself of course.:)
    i think thats how humans essentially ar
    think thats how humans essentially are and as much as we try theres always going to be some level of superficiality, unfortunately..
    but totally awesome essay minz :)

    ReplyDelete
  23. Well. Different people have different perspective of views. LIke what you said, never judge a book by its cover, but in reality, u cannot change the facts that people are still judging people from like looks, figures, features and so on.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Lee Tat says:
    it is always easy to pass casual judgement, esp to strangers who we will never get to know. We can't read people's mind, don;t know what they have been thru in their lives, so we can never adequately judge others.

    like what Hassan told his son, never hurt anyone, even though he/she is a bad person, becoz there is a chance that he/she will be good again

    so nvr judge anyone too, coz even though he/she appears to be in the wrong, becoz we never really know what exactly happened

    ReplyDelete
  25. Yes, I agree that we shouldn't judge other people based only on their appearance. Like what happened between the Chinese woman and the Singaporean, I guess it's just our perception of these foreigners who are coming Singapore to work and I believe the media had very much influenced us with the reports on how foreign workers/talents are getting better pay jobs than some Singaporeans or some companies would rather hire foreigners because it would be cheaper for them. Furthermore, there were also negative reports on Chinese women that were broadcasted. Thus, based on all these information, we would unknowingly form our own impression of these people which will distort our perception of them.

    ReplyDelete
  26. This is what i call a blog.

    ReplyDelete
  27. oh god, lynnette! why do we have to link that deceitful (in appearance) guy to this topic?!! and in almost every other topic??!
    memories do serve as a punishment at times, my dear.
    back to the main topic: do not judge a book by its cover.
    it's a nearly impossible task to change the mindset of the superficial human race. so i would say: let's forget about this topic and leave it for making small talk (under the disguise of checking out that cute girl/guy). scheming? ya, true. but we are humans! it's in out nature to do so!
    we are all attracted to beautiful things. even babies show more interest in pictures of good looking people.
    there is still some hope though: it is up to the individual to put aside this rigid thinking.
    with the various media conveying the message of being young and beautiful (take note of the title of the NO.1 selling women's magazine in Singapore from mid Sep onwards) and the passion we have for celeb gossips, it would be a long while, or maybe never, that we can even witness a slight decrease in such rigid mindset.
    to top this all, lynette once told a group of us that this guy in sch only talks to girls who are pretty, cute, hot or popular.(he told her this personally, right from the horse's mouth)
    wow!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Well.. after reading your post i find the question we should all be thinking about is why do people stereotype? i think its because they are afraid of the unexpected so instead they decide things before hand... and as for the event tt u saw u could consider tt the man used such critical statements it was probably in the heat of the argument when in fact usually people do not think of others in such a way? Any way, its a good analysis on the matter x))

    ReplyDelete